contact information
Department of
Life Sciences Communication
University of Wisconsin–Madison
309 Hiram Smith Hall (map)
1545 Observatory Drive
Madison, WI 53706-1215
(v) +1.608.262.1614
(f) +1.608.265.3042
E-mail: scheufele at wisc.edu
Google Plus: +dietram
Facebook: facebook.com/dietram
Twitter: @dietram
office hours
During the academic year, click here to schedule an appointment through Google Calendar.
what's new
(Click here for current C.V.)
january 18, 2012: Online-first version of new article in Science and Public Policy with Youngjae Kim and ELizabeth Corley, clustering U.S. nanoscientists based on their regulatory policy stances
january 9, 2012: New article with Kang Namkoong and Timothy Fung in Mass Communication & Society, explaining the role that emotional reponses toward candidates play in mobilizing voters
december 28, 2011: New article in Research Evaluation with Jan Youtie et al. on the links between scientists' views on the social implications of nanotechnology and the academic areas in which they publish
december 4, 2011: Online draft of forthcoming Communication
Yearbook chapter
with Matthew C. Nisbet on Social media, contextualized news, and the future of political journalism
november 28, 2011: CSPO lunchtime talk on the political dynamics surrounding emerging technologies in the U.S., co-sponsored by the School of Politics and Global Studies and the Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes, Arizona State University
november 15, 2011: New article in Communication Research with Anthony Dudo et al., on TV's influences on public attitudes toward science in modern media environments
november 4, 2011: New study on scientists' willingness to engage with media and the public available as open-access download at Journal of Nanoparticle Research
october 21, 2011: Talk on "The nanotech consumer" at Rutgers conference on Understanding Consumer Acceptance of Food Nanotechnology
october 19, 2011: Online first version of new article with Michael Xenos and colleagues on the motivations for online learning about science
september 25, 2011: Talk on "Emerging Technologies after 9/11" for
Wisconsin Academy of Science, Arts & Letters
(Click here for the Vimeo version.)
september 10, 2011: Online first version of new article with Ashley Anderson and colleagues on trust in scientists as sources of information about emerging technologies.
july 28, 2011: Online draft of new chapter with Shanto Iyengar on "New directions for framing research" for forthcoming Oxford Handbook of Political Communication Theories.
july 27, 2011: New article with Eunkyung Kim and Jeong Yeob Han in Mass Communication & Society on differentially stronger mobilization effects of discussion among citizens who are willing to express divergent opinions.
july 25, 2011: New column for DAAD Länderprofile comparing the academic systems in Germany and the U.S.
july 23, 2011: Online-first version of new article with Pete Ladwig et al. in Science and Public Policy, examining the problems connected to using self-reported familiarity as a proxy measure of scientific literacy.
july 21, 2011: New article with Sei-Hill Kim et al. in Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly on the impact of news media on informed issue evaluations among voters.
june 16, 2011: New article in Science Communication with Shirley Ho and Elizabeth Corley comparing the factors influencing public and experts' attitudes toward nanotechnology.
june 10, 2011: New article in Nanotoxicology with David Berube et al. on expert assessments of nano particles and how to classify them for regulatory purposes.
may 19, 2011: New article with Michael Cacciatore and Elizabeth Corley in Public Understanding of Science on how mental associations with new technologies shape risk perceptions and attitudes among lay audiences.
may 13, 2011: New article in Mass Communication & Society with Shirley Ho et al. on the consequences of media bias perceptions.
april 18, 2011: Online-first version of new article with Amy Bree Becker in SSQ on what shapes attitudes toward gay marriage among different age groups.
march 4, 2011: Panelist at Civility & Democracy in America Conference, organized by WSU's Foley Institute for Public Policy & Public Service.
feruary 23, 2011: New article in Risk Analysis with Andy Binder et al. on (interpersonal) amplification of risk perceptions.
february 1, 2011: Working paper for Harvard's Shorenstein Center Paper Series on the sense and nonsense of public meetings as tools for science policy making.
january 20, 2011: Op-Ed in Milwaukee Journal Sentinel on pretested political rhetoric and America's fear of political complexity.
january 12, 2011: Online-first version of new article in Communication Research with Andrew R. Binder on the methodological challenges of tapping risk and benefits perceptions in surveys.
recent publications
and columns
Namkoong, K., Fung, T. K. F., & Scheufele, D. A. (2012). The politics of emotion: News media attention, emotional responses, and participation during the 2004 U.S. Presidential election. Mass Communication and Society, 15(1), 25-45. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2011.563894
Youtie, J., Carley, S., Shapira, P., Corley, E. A., & Scheufele, D. A. (2011). Perceptions and actions: Relationships of views on risk with citation actions of nanotechnology scientists. Research Evaluation, 20(5), 377-388. doi: 10.3152/095820211x13176484436014
Scheufele, D. A. (2011). Perspective: Public attitudes toward nanotechnology. In Susanna Hornig Priest (Ed.), Nanotechnology: Public perception and risk communication (pp. 71-78). New York: Taylor and Francis.
Xenos, M. A., Becker, A. B., Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A. (2011). Stimulating upstream engagement: An experimental study of nanotechnology information seeking. Social Science Quarterly, 92(5), 1191-1214. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00814.x
Dudo, A. D., Brossard, D., Shanahan, J. E., Scheufele, D. A., Morgan, M., & Signorelli, N. (2011). Science on television in the 21st century: Recent trends in portrayals and their contributions to public attitudes toward science. Communication Research, 38(6), 754-777. doi: 10.1177/0093650210384988
Kim, E., Scheufele, D. A., & Han, J. Y. (2011). Structure or predisposition? Exploring the interaction effect of discussion orientation and discussion heterogeneity on political participation. Mass Communication & Society, 14(4), 502-526. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2010.51346
Kim, S.-H., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., & Choi, D.-H. (2011). Deliberation in spite of controversy? News media and the public’s evaluation of a controversial issue in South Korea. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(2), 320-336.
Ho, S. S., Scheufele, D. A., & Corley, E. A. (2011). Value predispositions, mass media, and attitudes toward nanotechnology: The interplay of public and experts. Science Communication, 33(2), 167-200. doi: 10.1177/1075547010380386
Berube, D., Cummings, C., Cacciatore, M., Scheufele, D. A., & Kalin, J. (2011). Characteristics and classification of nanoparticles: Expert Delphi survey. Nanotoxicology, 5(2), 236-243. doi: 10.3109/17435390.2010.521633
Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Corley, E. A. (2011). From enabling technology to applications: The evolution of risk perceptions about nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 20(3), 385-404. doi: 10.1177/0963662509347815
Becker, A. B., & Scheufele, D. A. (2011). New voters, new outlook? Predispositions, social networks, and the changing politics of gay civil rights. Social Science Quarterly, 92(2), 324-345. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00771.x
Binder, A. R., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Gunther, A. C. (2011). Interpersonal amplification of risk? Citizen discussions and their impact on perceptions of risks and benefits of a biological research facility. Risk Analysis, 31(2), 324-334. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01516.x
Dudo, A. D., Dunwoody, S., & Scheufele, D. A. (2011). The emergence of nano news: Tracking thematic trends and changes in U.S. newspaper coverage of nanotechnology. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(1), 55-75.
Scheufele, D. A. (2011). Modern citizenship or policy dead end? Evaluating the need for public participation in science policy making, and why public meetings may not be the answer. Paper #R-34, Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy Research Paper Series. Harvard University. Cambridge, MA.
Scheufele, D. A. (2011, January 20). Our nation's fear of political complexity,Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
Dudo, A., Choi, D.-H., & Scheufele, D. A. (2011). Food nanotechnology in the news. Coverage patterns and thematic emphases during the last decade. Appetite, 56(1), 78-89. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.11.143
Ho, S. S., Scheufele, D. A., & Corley, E. A. (2010). Making sense of policy choices: Understanding the roles of value predispositions, mass media, and cognitive processing in public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 12(8), 2703-2715. doi: 10.1007/s11051-010-0038-8
Scheufele, D. A. (2010). Survey research. In S. H. Priest (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science and technology communication (Vol. 2, pp. 853-856). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kim, S.-H., Han, M., & Scheufele, D. A. (2010). Think about him this way: Priming, news media, and South Koreans' evaluation of the president. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(3), 299-319. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edp057
Dalrymple, K. E., & Scheufele, D. A. (2010). Public understanding of nanotechnology. In D. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of nanoscience and society (Vol. 2, pp. 641-642). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Scheufele, D. A., & Dalrymple, K. E. (2010). Public attitudes toward nanotechnology. In D. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of nanoscience and society (Vol. 2, pp. 633-635). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Becker, A. B., Dalrymple, K. E., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Gunther, A. C. (2010). Getting citizens involved: How controversial policy debates stimulate issue participation during a political campaign. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(2), 181-203. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edp047
Scheufele, D. A., & Dudo, A. (2010). Emerging agendas at the intersection of political and science communication: The case of nanotechnology. In C. Salmon (Ed.), Communication Yearbook(pp. 143-167). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Dalrymple, K. E., & Scheufele, D. A. (2010). Public understanding of nanotechnology. In D. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of nanoscience and society (Vol. 2, pp. 641-642). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Scheufele, D. A., & Dalrymple, K. E. (2010). Public attitudes toward nanotechnology. In D. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of nanoscience and society (Vol. 2, pp. 633-635). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Ladwig, P., Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Shaw, B. (2010). Narrowing the nano discourse? Materials Today, 13(5), 52-54. (doi: 10.1016/s1369-7021(10)70084-5)
Dahlstrom, M. F., & Scheufele, D. A. (2010). Diversity of television exposure and its association with the cultivation of concern for environmental risks. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 54-65.
(doi: 10.1080/17524030903509709)
Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2010). The changing information environment for nanotechnology: Online audiences and content. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 12(4), 1083-1094. (doi: 10.1007/s11051-010-9860-2)

Corley, E. A., & Scheufele, D. A. (2010). Outreach gone wrong? When we talk nano to the public, we are leaving behind key audiences. The Scientist, 24(1), p. 22.
Scheufele, B. T., & Scheufele, D. A. (2010). Of spreading activation, applicability, and schemas: Conceptual distinctions and their operational implications for measuring frames and framing effects. In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 110-134). New York: Routledge.
select talks
and interviews

Wisconsin Public Television, University Place - Public Perceptions if Nanotechnology
The National Academies, Space Studies Board – The "science" of communicating science and technology

Wisconsin Public Radio: The Joy Cardin Show – Trends in social media and communication technology (Listen to an MP3 recording here).

Materials Today podcast with James Williams - February 15, 2010. |